the NHS has my mother hostage medicating without consent as she has dementia, we served article 61 but they informed us today it the Magna Carta was repealed in 1969?
Have you sent them all notices in the process?
Quote from Article 61:
ARTICLE 61, MAGNA CARTA 1215
"61. Since, moreover, for God and the amendment of our kingdom and for the better allaying of the quarrel that has arisen between us and our barons, we have granted all these concessions, desirous that they should enjoy them in complete and firm endurance forever, we give and grant to them the underwritten security, namely, that the barons choose five and twenty barons of the kingdom, whomsoever they will, who shall be bound with all their might, to observe and hold, and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties we have granted and confirmed to them by this our present Charter, so that if we, or our justiciar, or our bailiffs or any one of our officers, shall in anything be at fault towards anyone, or shall have broken any one of the articles of this peace or of this security, and the offense be notified to four barons of the foresaid five and twenty, the said four barons shall repair to us (or our justiciar, if we are out of the realm) and, laying the transgression before us, petition to have that transgression redressed without delay.
..."
You can also point out the petition by the barons' committee and the Queen's response.
Barons:
"We find ourselves living in exceptional times, which call for exceptional measures. Hence our petition to Her Majesty, which exercises rights unused for over 300 years – clause 61 of Magna Carta, which were reinforced by article 5 of the Bill of Rights.
As you know, the wording of clause 61 says: …and, laying the transgression before us, petition to have that transgression redressed without delay…And we shall procure nothing from anyone, directly or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such things has been procured, let it be void and null."
The response which does NOT rebuke the barons' invocation of A61:
“I am commanded by The Queen to reply to your letter of 23rd March and the accompanying petition to Her Majesty about the Treaty of Nice.”
The Queen continues to give this issue her closest attention. She is well aware of the strength of feeling which European Treaties, such as the Treaty of Nice, cause. As a constitutional sovereign, Her Majesty is advised by her Government who support this Treaty. As I am sure you know, the Treaty of Nice cannot enter force until it has been ratified by all Member States and in the United Kingdom this entails the necessary legislation being passed by Parliament.”
- Robin Janvrin
Because Robin and the Queen did not even attempt to dispute the exercise of A61 rights, they actually gave tacit confirmation that Magna Carta is the Law of the Land and ceded authority to the barons under Article 61.
When serving Article 61 I did indeed send a bundle of evidence in regards the false pandemic (which is being used to stop us from visiting) and the Magna Carta and how their legislation is Ultra Vires, but it seems their solicitor must have just googled a response. I emailed + sent a hard copy of your evidence bundle and asked her to read it thoroughly. I will serve Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure today.
I served Article 61 on my police chief which he did not answer within his 14 days, I served Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure.
Good work.
You are basically conditionally accepting their authority to hold your Mother IFthey can prove A61 is not currently in effect. They cannot prove this so they are forced to admit they do not have the authority to hold your Mother.
I need some advice, The hospital basically are refusing to accept our standing and refusing our request to get my mother released into our care. They are now taking us to the court of protection.
My questions are;
Would our standing under article 61 be accepted by the judge?
The hospital has advised we get a legal representation, would this affect our standing under article 61?
Entering courts is not something you want to do. These courts are not courts of law - they are courts run by traitors and unwitting accomplices of traitors. If they were not either of those, they would be standing under Article 61.
Date served applies to that notice in particular. I think you can simply send a note rectifying the mistaken date. You are acting in good faith and the law is on your side. The criminals who have taken over our countries won't recognize the law because they are trying to replace law with their fraudulent rules.
Their courts are not courts of law and so entering them without really knowing what you're doing will invariably lead to consenting to their authority - at which point you've given up your rights and become an accomplice in treason.
Not exactly replying DC, but I've followed this thread with great interest and a huge amount of sympathy for you and your poor mum. Is there an update please, not just on your case but how your mum is doing too?
I am new to all this, how do I get started and what do I have to do to protect myself and my loved ones from all this Tyranny and oppression/slavery. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
I wonder if anybody is monitoring this site? Many questions are months old! All I can say is that you look under the "resource" tab and follow the steps, if you are happy to do so without knowing exactly what it means for you. I'm asking questions first to get a better understanding, so as not to end up in deep kaka at the end of it on some spectrum.
Keep learning and ask your own questions. Read a61 and MC1215 until you can understand the language and you're comfortable with it. Feel free to throw thoughts and questions up!
So im looking for some clarification. I’ve done my oath, and sent off notice of lawful standing to the court and police, is the the standard procedure, or should I have only sent the Notice to police and court if they make ‘demands’ on me. I’m a little confused since getting my reply from the courts which didn’t reply ’in substance’ eg no acknowledgement of the treason. They are not making ‘demands’ on me, an admin on FB said to progress to the ‘Conditional Acceptance’ Notice, is this the way to go if no one is making demands on me?
Gosh, you've been waiting an awfully long time for a response. I'm only new, but from my understanding (which I admit is limited) you don't need to wait for any demands...you send your documents as outlined so that authorities understand your position and proclamation against the treasonous practices they are carrying out. Someone please correct me if I got it wrong. I hope I'm not waiting as long for a reply to my list of questions!
Nothing wrong with notifying more people!
Conditional Acceptance does require demands to accept on condition. Please see the Process page on this site :)
Hello, newbie here, I have read most of the material and have a host of questions.
How exactly did the treason occur in Australia and other realm countries? Detailed explanation would be much appreciated.
Much of the "evidence" is UK based (I'm in Aus), is there a version of "evidence" more directly relative to us or other countries within the realm? It may be more helpful when dealing with local authorities if it is more relevant.
Once we complete the steps involving the serving of documents, how do we practice lawful dissent?
Is there a list of do's and don'ts?
How does it affect people who are receiving social security payments and pensions?
With most public services having been corporatised can we still access these services (eg. medicare, public housing etc)?
How does it affect our home ownership and bank mortgages?
How does it affect small business owner/operators?
That's it for now, I'm certain I will have more once I understand the above mentioned items. Thank you in advance for taking the time to answer.
Treason occurred when they subjugated the well-being of their people to the will of transnational partnerships, UN, etc. I believe this happened by infiltration over many years. Research the backgrounds of your politicians and the deals they have signed on your behalf - you will find your treason evidence in the trade deals and "compacts."
The evidence is UK based because A61 was invoked in the UK and that is what this process hinges on - Aus is under the Commonwealth umbrella so is commanded under A61 like everyone. Local evidence not required so is your choice to include if you feel you can strengthen the message and highlight the threat to national and realm security.
Lawful Dissent is the use of your voice to speak facts and give notice to the uninformed. It is practiced by spreading awareness peacefully and lawfully.
Do learn, do notify, don't panic :)
Everyone seems to receive their benefits and entitlements but this is real life and anything can happen.
Cannot make too much comment because don't know everything but haven't heard any bad reports yet. I would suggest becoming familiar enough with the material to answer this yourself and basing your choice only off of what you, yourself, understand to be factual.
the NHS has my mother hostage medicating without consent as she has dementia, we served article 61 but they informed us today it the Magna Carta was repealed in 1969?
Have you sent them all notices in the process? Quote from Article 61: ARTICLE 61, MAGNA CARTA 1215
"61. Since, moreover, for God and the amendment of our kingdom and for the better allaying of the quarrel that has arisen between us and our barons, we have granted all these concessions, desirous that they should enjoy them in complete and firm endurance forever, we give and grant to them the underwritten security, namely, that the barons choose five and twenty barons of the kingdom, whomsoever they will, who shall be bound with all their might, to observe and hold, and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties we have granted and confirmed to them by this our present Charter, so that if we, or our justiciar, or our bailiffs or any one of our officers, shall in anything be at fault towards anyone, or shall have broken any one of the articles of this peace or of this security, and the offense be notified to four barons of the foresaid five and twenty, the said four barons shall repair to us (or our justiciar, if we are out of the realm) and, laying the transgression before us, petition to have that transgression redressed without delay.
..." You can also point out the petition by the barons' committee and the Queen's response. Barons: "We find ourselves living in exceptional times, which call for exceptional measures. Hence our petition to Her Majesty, which exercises rights unused for over 300 years – clause 61 of Magna Carta, which were reinforced by article 5 of the Bill of Rights.
As you know, the wording of clause 61 says: …and, laying the transgression before us, petition to have that transgression redressed without delay…And we shall procure nothing from anyone, directly or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such things has been procured, let it be void and null." The response which does NOT rebuke the barons' invocation of A61:
“I am commanded by The Queen to reply to your letter of 23rd March and the accompanying petition to Her Majesty about the Treaty of Nice.” The Queen continues to give this issue her closest attention. She is well aware of the strength of feeling which European Treaties, such as the Treaty of Nice, cause. As a constitutional sovereign, Her Majesty is advised by her Government who support this Treaty. As I am sure you know, the Treaty of Nice cannot enter force until it has been ratified by all Member States and in the United Kingdom this entails the necessary legislation being passed by Parliament.” - Robin Janvrin
Because Robin and the Queen did not even attempt to dispute the exercise of A61 rights, they actually gave tacit confirmation that Magna Carta is the Law of the Land and ceded authority to the barons under Article 61.
Cam Rennie
Thank you for your reply.
When serving Article 61 I did indeed send a bundle of evidence in regards the false pandemic (which is being used to stop us from visiting) and the Magna Carta and how their legislation is Ultra Vires, but it seems their solicitor must have just googled a response. I emailed + sent a hard copy of your evidence bundle and asked her to read it thoroughly. I will serve Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure today.
I served Article 61 on my police chief which he did not answer within his 14 days, I served Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure.
Good work. You are basically conditionally accepting their authority to hold your Mother IF they can prove A61 is not currently in effect. They cannot prove this so they are forced to admit they do not have the authority to hold your Mother.
Cam Rennie
I need some advice, The hospital basically are refusing to accept our standing and refusing our request to get my mother released into our care. They are now taking us to the court of protection.
My questions are;
Would our standing under article 61 be accepted by the judge?
The hospital has advised we get a legal representation, would this affect our standing under article 61?
Thank you in advance for any help given.
Entering courts is not something you want to do. These courts are not courts of law - they are courts run by traitors and unwitting accomplices of traitors. If they were not either of those, they would be standing under Article 61. Date served applies to that notice in particular. I think you can simply send a note rectifying the mistaken date. You are acting in good faith and the law is on your side. The criminals who have taken over our countries won't recognize the law because they are trying to replace law with their fraudulent rules. Their courts are not courts of law and so entering them without really knowing what you're doing will invariably lead to consenting to their authority - at which point you've given up your rights and become an accomplice in treason.
Just another quick question sorry,
'Date Notice served: ???
NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal. Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent'
Date notice served is the date of the notice of standing or the date I sent notice of default and opportunity to cure?
I think I made a mistake and put the original date I served the first notice should I send a new default and opportunity to cure?
Sorry I have so much going on, I am really stressed.
Not exactly replying DC, but I've followed this thread with great interest and a huge amount of sympathy for you and your poor mum. Is there an update please, not just on your case but how your mum is doing too?
To stay in honour, you could send a note clarifying your mistake.
I am new to all this, how do I get started and what do I have to do to protect myself and my loved ones from all this Tyranny and oppression/slavery. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
I wonder if anybody is monitoring this site? Many questions are months old! All I can say is that you look under the "resource" tab and follow the steps, if you are happy to do so without knowing exactly what it means for you. I'm asking questions first to get a better understanding, so as not to end up in deep kaka at the end of it on some spectrum.
Keep learning and ask your own questions. Read a61 and MC1215 until you can understand the language and you're comfortable with it. Feel free to throw thoughts and questions up!
So im looking for some clarification. I’ve done my oath, and sent off notice of lawful standing to the court and police, is the the standard procedure, or should I have only sent the Notice to police and court if they make ‘demands’ on me. I’m a little confused since getting my reply from the courts which didn’t reply ’in substance’ eg no acknowledgement of the treason. They are not making ‘demands’ on me, an admin on FB said to progress to the ‘Conditional Acceptance’ Notice, is this the way to go if no one is making demands on me?
Gosh, you've been waiting an awfully long time for a response. I'm only new, but from my understanding (which I admit is limited) you don't need to wait for any demands...you send your documents as outlined so that authorities understand your position and proclamation against the treasonous practices they are carrying out. Someone please correct me if I got it wrong. I hope I'm not waiting as long for a reply to my list of questions!
Nothing wrong with notifying more people! Conditional Acceptance does require demands to accept on condition. Please see the Process page on this site :)
Hello, newbie here, I have read most of the material and have a host of questions.
How exactly did the treason occur in Australia and other realm countries? Detailed explanation would be much appreciated.
Much of the "evidence" is UK based (I'm in Aus), is there a version of "evidence" more directly relative to us or other countries within the realm? It may be more helpful when dealing with local authorities if it is more relevant.
Once we complete the steps involving the serving of documents, how do we practice lawful dissent?
Is there a list of do's and don'ts?
How does it affect people who are receiving social security payments and pensions?
With most public services having been corporatised can we still access these services (eg. medicare, public housing etc)?
How does it affect our home ownership and bank mortgages?
How does it affect small business owner/operators?
That's it for now, I'm certain I will have more once I understand the above mentioned items. Thank you in advance for taking the time to answer.
Treason occurred when they subjugated the well-being of their people to the will of transnational partnerships, UN, etc. I believe this happened by infiltration over many years. Research the backgrounds of your politicians and the deals they have signed on your behalf - you will find your treason evidence in the trade deals and "compacts."
The evidence is UK based because A61 was invoked in the UK and that is what this process hinges on - Aus is under the Commonwealth umbrella so is commanded under A61 like everyone. Local evidence not required so is your choice to include if you feel you can strengthen the message and highlight the threat to national and realm security.
Lawful Dissent is the use of your voice to speak facts and give notice to the uninformed. It is practiced by spreading awareness peacefully and lawfully.
Do learn, do notify, don't panic :)
Everyone seems to receive their benefits and entitlements but this is real life and anything can happen.
Cannot make too much comment because don't know everything but haven't heard any bad reports yet. I would suggest becoming familiar enough with the material to answer this yourself and basing your choice only off of what you, yourself, understand to be factual.