PRACTICAL

Why is it that people are always looking for a quick fix , they don't care to learn what it's all about they just want to benefit from it now. I sit here reading people's questions and comments , only to shake my head and write this post. The topic here is a very important one and should not be taken lightly, that being said don't be so lazy and before you ask stupid questions that you would know if you simple took the time to read. Come on people ....you have the technology try to use it ....

Reading the oaths templates - - Language is wrong, we are beings, the term person/persona/people/peoples is unlawful. - We do not sign - we autograph - Not a royal command - a royal Proclamation - The transference of allegiance is also worded poorly and raises concerns. - in "understanding" some wrongs done by the present holder of the office of sovereign. - WE DO NOT STAND UNDER. - The subtle differences between the oath to self and the oath to Barrons is proof of subterfuge. Commas where there should be full stops, the deletion of the word "I" and the addition of the word "and", the use of the word transfer, and peoples. Changes the legal context of the oath to be a transfer of trust from one controlling party to another. We the beings of the realm, are SOVEREIGN! the meaning of the word literally means no one stands over us, we are the highest of high, we appoint the king In the notice of conditional Acceptance Exhibit A States in the last paragraph that "The people may rise up and wage war" - we are not people we are beings, and if we wage war, we change our status under the rules of war from loyalist to combatant. These subtle but major errors destabilise your followings ability to have faith in organised dissent. I have not read further but i expect to find similar errors in other documents, as if the military tactic of controlled opposition is being used to leed the ones willing to dissent, down a path that is not in their best interests. Educate yourself.

The queen has died does anything need to change in the notices including the evidence part?